I had a very interesting comment to my last post.
“Unfortunately most of what I have seen from these people is dominated by a desire to keep the control of the learning process in the hands of the teacher.”
My friend, you have been reading the wrong stuff! In recent years, concepts such as learner-centredness, motivation, identity and learner autonomy have been at the heart of the TESOL field. If you go to any major conference, you will find thousands of teachers and academics, who commit both their professional lives and spare time to work together and improve their ability to teach/help learners learn (why is everyone so cynical about these people??).
“I have to admit that I have been influenced by Krashen and found a lot of wisdom there”
Actually, Krashen had very little time for the issues you care strongly about, like affectivity and motivation. He conceptualized learners as essentially passive processors of input. Since Krashen’s published his theories, which are almost 30 years old now, linguists have spent a tremendous amount of time investigating them. The balance of evidence from these studies suggests that he was off the mark. I could go more into this, but I don’t want to repeat previous posts. Anyway, there are more useful theories around, that I’m sure you would find very useful, and allow you to improve your website (the Lexical Approach, Communicative methodology, countless insights from the study of corpus data).
Every teacher I know would be delighted to know that their students used lingQ to supplement their learning. Can it replace classroom learning? Certainly not yet. In the future, I think so. That is, if these sites become more sophisticated, and, dare I say it, informed by educational expertise (I didn’t say expert!)”